4/12/2023 0 Comments Salomon wing pro![]() If that’s a big deal for you, you’ll need to swap them out (this doesn’t seem like it would be hard). However, the plastic lace guards mean that there’s very little friction on the tabs, so you can’t create zonal tension like a normal lacing system. There’s a very snug yet unrestrictive feel to Salomon’s Endofit that allows me to run my laces looser than I would expect to yield a secure feel. For the sake of comparison, my feet do well in Salomons, as well as some of Scarpa’s footwear (Tech Ascent, Maestrale RS, Freedom RS) and the 2015-16 Dynafit TLT6. I never had any issues with blisters while using either medium cushion or thin socks, which tells me that the fit was spot on. I usually wear a size 9 shoe, and the size 9 Wings Pro 2 fit me well. Salomon is known for having a slightly wider fit to their footwear, and the Wings Pro 2 do well by my feet in that regard. The uppers are made of a stretch mesh that breathes impressively well. The lower outside of the shoe is protected by a mudguard, while TPU toe cap keeps your tootsies less stubbed than they might be. Kevlar laces and plastic brackets provide a durable, uniform lace system that tucks away and doesn’t come undone while thrashing through underbrush. To those ends they added a layer in the midsole to avoid rock-punching your metatarsals and a bit more cushioning than Salomon’s Sense series along with “downhill-oriented lug geometry” that bites into trails on the down. ![]() Salomon positions the Wings Pro 2 as a firmer/rockier ground, more downhill-oriented shoe within their trail running line. I tried on some shoes during a Salomon demo event at the 2015 Rut Mountain Runs, and the Wings Pro 2 seemed both to fit my foot and the bill I outlined above so I spent last summer running, scrambling, and climbing in them. Enough stiffness and edging ability to dig in on hard dirt and support low 5th climbing. Soles that grip well on dirt, scree, and bare rock.ĥ. Good ventilation (approaches) balanced by some level of water repellency (snow and mud)Ĥ. It needs to fit my hobbit feet (wide-ish, higher instep, big heel)Ģ. For me, a proper Glacier runner needs the following qualities:ġ. None of those categories do well on the long approaches, which I’ve come to regard as the proper crux of most of the walking/climbing/wandering I do. Low end mountaineering boots, mid-height approach shoes, proper backpacking boots. Over the past eight years or so, I’ve tried a bunch of different footwear to accommodate the things we do here. All this means that finding the right things to put on your feet is not a simple task. Broken cliffs mean 4th and 5th class climbing near the summits. Ten to twenty mile days of trail and scree wandering lead to frequent snow travel. ![]() Long approaches are the standard in winter, and shorten somewhat in the summer. I grew up and currently live in the shadow of Glacier National Park in Northwest Montana, which could be succinctly described as a highly scenic collection of 8000-10,000ft choss piles under the cover of snow for at least half of the year. There’s no question that the places we play and the demands of that terrain shape the specific needs for the gear in our lives. Locations Tested: Locations: Glacier National Park, Waterton Lakes National Park, Big Sky, Stone Hill, Blodgett Canyon, Mission Mountains Wilderness, MTĭays Tested 22 days, 234 miles, 65,900 ft of vertical gain. Midsole elevations: 27 mm/17 mm (10 mm drop)
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |